Provide the Food and Drug Administration Feedback on Distributed and Point-of-Care Manufacturing; Comments Due December 13, 2022
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is seeking input on distributed manufacturing (DM) and point-of-care (POC) manufacturing because of their potential to enable rapid, localized, and timely response to demands for therapies. Although no such manufacturing is currently approved by the FDA, the agency has already seen interest by several technology developers. The FDA Centers for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) formed the Framework for Regulatory Advanced Manufacturing Evaluation (FRAME) initiative to determine whether an application using an advanced manufacturing technology can fit within the existing regulatory framework. Findings from this initiative would inform potential future policy development.
The FDA has identified areas of consideration in a discussion paper titled, Distributed Manufacturing and Point-of-Care Manufacturing of Drugs, and is asking for public feedback on key questions identified in the paper, such as:
- How often might a DM unit move to a new location and what might an applicant report to the agency when doing so?
- What locations are envisioned for POC unit operation?
- How might a centralized quality system (i.e., at a “parent location”) ensure each manufacturing unit complies with regulatory requirements and quality standards?
- What type of business relationships are envisioned between companies developing POC manufacturing platforms and health care facilities?
Stakeholders can provide input in various ways:
- Attend the public workshop on November 14-16.
- Submit comments to the public docket under docket number FDA-2022-N-2316.
- If developing direct manufacturing or point-of-care technology, contact CDER’s Emerging Technology Program at CDER-ETT@fda.hhs.gov or CBER’s Advanced Technologies Team at Biologics@fda.hhs.gov (add “CATT” to the subject line).
FDA Publishes Draft Guidance on Voluntary Consensus Standards Recognition Program for Regenerative Medicine Therapies
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responding to needs for regulatory predictability and leverage of stakeholder efforts for standardization in regenerative medicine therapies, including cellular therapy, via a draft guidance that introduces a voluntary consensus standards recognition program.
Published in June 2022, Voluntary Consensus Standards Recognition Program for Regenerative Medicine Therapies: Draft Guidance for Industry acknowledges many unique challenges caused by the novelty of regenerative medicine therapy products. The proposed standards recognition program for regenerative medicine therapies (SRP-RMT) is intended to:
- Use agency expertise to evaluate and recognize voluntary consensus standards.
- Provide transparency to industry and other stakeholders regarding CBER’s thinking about a particular method or approach.
- Promote the visibility and use of standards applicable to the agency’s mission.
The draft guidance describes the purpose of the program, procedures for evaluating standards for recognition, documenting the use of a recognized standard, and questions and answers.
Comments on the draft guidance are due by September 14, 2022. Comments may be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA-2022-D-0745-0001.
A public workshop to discuss the guidance will be hosted by the Standards Coordinating Body (SCB) free of charge on August 24, 2022 at 12 pm ET. Register online.
FACT Provides Input to Donor Registry and Regulatory Agency
Just like cellular therapy itself, donor registry and regulatory requirements evolve over time. As a voluntary, peer-based accrediting organization, FACT reviews updates to requirements that are relevant to our Standards and affect our accredited organizations. We take every opportunity to provide input on these requirements as a value-added service to the FACT community.
There have been notable requests for public comments in the first half of 2022, and FACT committees, task forces, and leadership have evaluated draft requirements and submitted comments when determined to be appropriate. These include:
- Proposed NMDP/Be the Match Participation Criteria A00960, titled, “U.S. Apheresis and Collection Center Participation Criteria”: FACT expressed support for NMDP/Be the Match’s efforts to simplify and streamline criteria, requested clarification regarding whether the proposed criteria reflect a change in current practice regarding Apheresis Centers’ option to decline the opportunity to share NMDP collection center adult results with other NMDP clients, and reiterated support of retaining this option for NMDP collection centers.
- Draft Version of 25th Edition NMDP Standards: FACT expressed support for the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be the Match’s efforts to streamline and simplify its Standards and provided recommendations for increasing clarity regarding the requirements and the scope of related accrediting organizations (e.g., FACT, the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT & EBMT (JACIE), and WMDA/NetCord).
- Draft guidance from the FDA proposed rule titled, “Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Classification of Human Leukocyte, Neutrophil and Platelet Antigen and Antibody Tests”: FACT expressed its support of the comments submitted under separate cover by the American Society for Histocompatibility & Immunogenetics (ASHI) and opposed FDA’s proposal to classify HLA devices into class II with special controls.
Read the proposed FDA rule
- Draft guidance from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), titled: “Considerations for the Development of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Products”: FACT comments focused on the importance of relationships between cellular therapy product manufacturing companies and the health care institutions in their collection and treatment site networks to enhance patient safety, product efficacy, and patient access while minimizing the burdens on the health care institutions. FACT also recommended references to ISBT 128 coding and labeling and ASTCT consensus criteria for grading cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicities.
Read the draft FDA guidance
Determining Donor Eligibility for Donor Lymphocyte Infusions Aliquoted from a Product Intended for Transplantation
By Patrick J. Hanley, PhD
Chair, FACT Education Committee
Chief & Director, Cellular Therapy Program
Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Center for Cancer and Immunology Research
Children’s National Hospital & The George Washington University
Haploidentical hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation has increased drastically over the past five years. One reason for this increase is the introduction of T cell Receptor (TCR) α/β and CD19 depletion. In this manufacturing process, the α/β T cells and CD19 B cells are depleted, leaving γ/δ T cells, CD34+ stem cells, and other immune cells that are infused into the patient. The hypothesis is that the γ/δ T cells will provide an anti-tumor effect (in the case of malignancies) and anti-viral immunity, while the lack of α/β T cells will reduce the incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, the very limited CD3+ alpha beta T cell dose (often less than 1×105 CD3+ α/β /kg) may leave the recipient more susceptible to viral infections, or even engraftment failure. Therefore, clinicians often request that the cell processing facility cryopreserve aliquots of the α/β T cell-containing fraction to be used as a potential donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI).
Donor eligibility gurus may already see the conundrum: the TCR α/β/CD19-depleted cellular therapy product is an HPC product, for which donor infectious disease testing is allowed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up to 30 days prior to collection; DLI is considered a therapeutic, leukocyte-rich tissue and therefore requires infectious disease testing to be done before or after seven days from collection. Programs can be conservative and simply draw samples for testing within seven days to cover both HPC products and therapeutic products. However, this may not align with the existing process for work-up of the donor in preparation for donation. In some cases, it may require an additional blood draw, which is not in the best interest of the donor.
Based on previous clarification from the FDA (which was confirmed by the FACT office in August 2021), the most straightforward way to address this issue is to recognize that separate eligibility determination is NOT required for the T cell product used as DLI if the lymphocytes were collected as a part of the HPC collection. When the donor of the HPC product is screened and tested in accordance with regulations and determined to be eligible for donation, the donor eligibility determination also applies to the remaining portion of the same product that is used for subsequent therapy.
The following example was presented during a FACT webinar by Safa Karandish, MT(ASCP) from the FDA in 2015 as part of a presentation titled, “FDA presents: Using Donor Screening and Testing to Determine Donor Eligibility,” which can be found on the FACT website at: http://www.factweb.org/forms/store/ProductFormPublic/fda-presents-using-donor-screening-and-testing-to-determine-donor-eligibility.As most of us can attest, with a number of nuances and exceptions to the regulations, donor eligibility determination can be complicated. It’s a relief to hear that in the case of labeling products for DLI from a product collected for an HPC transplant, the regulations are straightforward and the DLI product does not require separate donor eligibility determination.
FDA Conference on Regulatory Education for Industry is Next Week
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is hosting its annual conference, Regulatory Education for Industry (REdI), virtually next week from July 19-23. Register for this free conference to learn directly from senior leadership at FDA. Continuing education credits for several professional organizations are available, and this conference can also be used toward GxP training now required by the eighth edition FACT-JACIE Hematopoietic Cellular Therapy Standards.
For the first time, this conference will have tracks for three medical products: drugs, devices, and biologics. The biologics track will focus on different aspects of product development of advanced therapies regulated by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Topics include regulation of tissue products under 21 CFR part 1271; development and regulation of cellular, gene, and plasma-derived therapies, and expedited programs for advanced therapies.
Register for the free, virtual FDA REdI Conference
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Publishes Updated Donor Eligibility Information Amid COVID-19
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to provide updates regarding donor eligibility determination amid the COVID-19 pandemic. In January, it posted an announcement with information about considerations for donor eligibility and vaccines.
The FDA does not recommend testing asymptomatic donors of human cells, tissues, and cell and tissue based products (HCT/Ps), but does offer considerations for donor screening based on information known at this time. HCT/P establishments may wish to consider whether the donor in the 28 days prior to collection:
- cared for, lived with, or otherwise had close contact with individuals diagnosed with or suspected of having COVID-19 infection; or
- had been diagnosed with or suspected of having COVID-19 infection; or
- had a positive diagnostic test (e.g., nasopharyngeal swab) for SARS-CoV-2 but never developed symptoms.
The FDA also states that, based on information available at this time, donors who have received non-replicating, inactivated, or RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are not precluded from donating HCT/Ps.
United States Food and Drug Administration Issues Guidance on COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on April 8, 2020 the issuance of final guidance regarding the administration and study of convalescent plasma collected from individuals who have recovered from COVID-19. The use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma is regulated by the FDA as an investigational product, and health care providers wishing to use this therapy as an option must therefore participate in investigational pathways. The guidance provides information on this and a variety of topics as listed below:
- pathways for use of investigational COVID-19 convalescent plasma,
- patient eligibility,
- collection of COVID-19 convalescent plasma, including donor eligibility and donor qualifications,
- labeling, and
FDA Releases Suggestions for Evaluating Donors for Coronavirus
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published Important Information for Human Cell, Tissue, or Cellular or Tissue-based Product (HCT/P) Establishments Regarding the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak on February 14, 2020. This announcement notes that the FDA has been working closely with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and other federal and international agencies to monitor the outbreak of coronavirus (COVID-19).
The FDA stated that respiratory viruses are not generally known to be transmitted by HCT/Ps, potential for coronavirus transmission via these products is unknown. Although routine screening measures for infections are already in use, some programs may wish to use additional donor screening in response to this outbreak. Based on limited information available, the FDA says programs may wish to consider the donor history in the 28 days prior to cell collection for potential donors who have:
- traveled to areas with COVID-19 outbreaks, as defined by CDC
- lived with individuals diagnosed with or suspected of having COVID-19 infection; or
- been diagnosed with or suspected of having COVID-19 infection.
The following are additional details provided by FDA:
FDA Finalizes Gene Therapy Guidances
In 2018, the United States FDA released six draft guidance documents regarding gene therapy, and the final versions of these documents were released in January 2020. More details can be found in the Just the FACTs newsletter article, FDA Releases Six Draft Guidance Documents for Gene Therapy (2018).
The final documents can be accessed online:
- Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications; Guidance for Industry
- Testing of Retroviral Vector-Based Human Gene Therapy Products for Replication Competent Retrovirus During Product Manufacture and Patient Follow-up; Guidance for Industry
- Long Term Follow-Up After Administration of Human Gene Therapy Products; Guidance for Industry
- Human Gene Therapy for Retinal Disorders; Guidance for Industry
- Human Gene Therapy for Rare Diseases; Guidance for Industry
- Human Gene Therapy for Hemophilia; Guidance for Industry
FDA Announces Public Workshop on End-to-End Development of Individualized Therapeutics
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a public workshop titled, “Facilitating End-to-End Development of Individualized Therapeutics,” focusing on development of individualized therapeutic products for one or a small number of patients. This workshop will be on March 3, 2020 from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ET, and can be attended in person or via webcast. Registration is required.
Per the FDA announcement, the objectives of the workshop are:
- “To discuss scientific challenges to development of individualized therapeutics, and ongoing efforts to adapt products manufactured based on a technology platform to treat diseases affecting one individual or a very small number of patients; explore lessons learned, logistical challenges, failures, and successes.
- To examine challenges under the current U.S. regulatory framework that need to be addressed to have a clear pathway for access to individualized therapeutics, including licensed manufacture and consistent delivery of safe and effective products.
- To explore challenges from the patient perspective that limit development and access to individualized therapeutics; consider research and development, ethical, and product availability and access issues.
- To identify new models of collaboration or synergies that may facilitate aspects of development, including manufacturing, preclinical testing, clinical development, and continuing evaluation for consistent production, availability, and delivery of individualized therapeutic products.”
For more details and to register, see the FDA announcement.
Variability in Cell Collection for IEC Products Discussed with FDA during 2019 Cell Therapy Liaison Meeting
The Food and Drug Administration Cell Therapy Liaison Meeting (FDA CTLM) took place on March 5, 2019 and a summary of the meeting is now online. This meeting was made possible by 13 organizations serving the planning committee, led by Olive Sturtevant and the ISCT North America Legal and Regulatory Affairs Committee. Ms. Sturtevant is also a member of the FACT-JACIE Standards Steering Committee.
Four topics were presented to the FDA, including regulation of biobanking material for future products, collection of mononuclear cells (MNCs) for immune effector cell (IEC) products, minimum characterization criteria for clinical grade induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) products, and early interaction mechanisms for tool/device developers.
The presentation and discussion regarding the collection of MNCs for IEC products is particularly timely for many FACT-accredited apheresis facilities. The summary outlines the challenges Dr. Jay Raval presented on behalf of the American Society of Apheresis (ASFA) and the discussion with the FDA afterwards.
This summary may be useful to discussions between apheresis facilities and the commercial manufacturers they work with. It also provides ideas that the field could pursue to reduce variability to a meaningful level that will ensure quality IEC products without limiting the ability of experienced apheresis facilities to care for their patients.
This meeting is just one event regarding this issue in which FACT participated. We will continue to provide updates via the Just the FACTs newsletter as appropriate. In the meantime, we have appreciated the spirit of collaboration that has been demonstrated by commercial manufacturers, healthcare providers, related organizations, and many others.
CMS Releases Final Decision on National Coverage Determination for CAR T-cell Therapy for Cancers
The United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized its National Coverage Determination (NCD) for CAR T-cell Therapy for Cancers on August 7, 2019. Among other changes, the decision no longer requires Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) and now allows coverage for indications on FDA-approved indications and uses recommended by a citation in CMS-approved compendia. FACT appreciates CMS’s consideration of our comments and of those submitted by several of our stakeholders. Many of the changes will promote patient access to CAR T-cell therapy.
The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT), one of FACT’s parent organizations, indicated that it is also pleased with many of the changes from the proposed decision memo and responded with a comment letter about suggestions for continuing to improve reimbursement for this therapy.
We believe in the utility of FACT Standards to promote safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapies; increase harmonization across requirements of regulators, payers, and manufacturers; and reduce burden on hospitals. We will continue to work with all of these stakeholders to do our part to promote patient access.
Cellular Therapy Community Corner
The Cellular Therapy Community Corner provides a forum for the cell therapy community that includes educational opportunities, recent publications, and upcoming events.
ASGCT Debuts Patient Education Program
The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy (ASGCT) announced the first release of the Society’s Patient Education program, a new initiative for 2019. Designed by ASGCT committee volunteers in coordination with patient advocacy groups, the new patient-centered portal is designed to educate and inform patients, families, and the public on the status and promise of gene and cell therapies.
The following Sessions are now live on ASGCT.org:
Gene Therapy 101, which includes the following information:
Disease Treatments, which includes the following information:
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- X-Linked Myotubular Myopathy
- Leukodystrophy (coming February 15)
- Blood Disorders (coming February 22)
- Inherited Retinal Disorders (coming February 28)
All topics ultimately provide patients and patient advocates with video, text, and infographic resources to share with various stakeholders. ASGCT encourages people to share these resources with their friends and family.
FDA Outlines Planned Policies to Advance Development of Safe and Effective Cell and Gene Therapies
Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D. and Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
On January 15, 2019, FDA announced its plans to provide policy guidance and advance its drug development network over the coming year in response to increases in cell and gene therapy investigational new drug (IND) applications. The FDA anticipates receiving more than 200 INDs per year by 2020 and approving 10 to 20 cell and gene products a year by 2025.
The full statement outlines FDA’s policy agenda as it relates to these technologies.
Find a clinical trial through the Jason Carter Clinical Trials Program Offered by The National Marrow Donor Program®/Be The Match®
The National Marrow Donor Program®/Be The Match® is offering a new program, The Jason Carter Clinical Trials Program, designed to help patients with blood cancers or blood disorders and their families find and join clinical trials. Funding was provided by the Carter family, in memory of their son and brother, Jason Carter. This free program offers:
- One-on-one telephone support and information from a clinical trial nurse to help patients and families navigate their clinical trial search.
- Easy-to-use, web-based search tool to find relevant clinical trials: JasonCarterClinicalTrialsProgram.org
- Easy-to-understand educational resources for patients and families to learn about cancer treatment options and clinical trials.
On the JCCTP.org website, there are patient-friendly clinical trial descriptions related to leukemia, lymphoma, MDS, aplastic anemia, and more. Treatments in some of these clinical trials include blood or marrow transplant, but many others trials include the latest cell therapies such as CAR T and immunotherapies.
Patients can also apply for financial assistance from the Drs. Jeffrey and Isabel Chell Clinical Trials Travel Grant. This grant works to offset the cost of travel related to clinical trial participation. Grant eligibility information and application are available on JasonCarterClinicalTrialsProgram.org.
FDA Releases Six Draft Guidance Documents for Gene Therapy
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released six draft guidance documents related to gene therapy. Three of the guidance documents are disease-specific, and three are related to manufacturing. According to Scott Gottlieb, MD, FDA Commissioner, these documents are the building blocks of the FDA’s framework for advancing gene therapy while requiring safety and effectiveness. The guidance is part of the FDA’s efforts to provide clear recommendations to sponsors and researchers.
Read FDA Commissioner’s Statements
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs); Draft Guidance for Industry
The FDA highlights the importance of establishing standardized procedures for cell collection and handling across all collection sites for multi-center clinical trials to assure the quality and safety of the final product as well as ensuring control of the manufacturing process. A list of collection sites, the FDA Establishment Identifier, and accreditations for compliance with established standards (e.g., Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy) should be included in the IND.
Additional Manufacturing Draft Guidance Documents
Long Term Follow-up After Administration of Human Gene Therapy Products; Draft Guidance for Industry
Testing of Retroviral Vector-Based Human Gene Therapy Products for Replication Competent Retrovirus During Product Manufacture and Patient Follow-up; Draft Guidance for Industry
Disease-Specific Draft Guidance Documents
Human Gene Therapy for Hemophilia; Draft Guidance for Industry
Human Gene Therapy for Rare Diseases; Draft Guidance for Industry
Human Gene Therapy for Retinal Disorders; Draft Guidance for Industry
FACT Submits Comments to Governmental Agencies
FACT-accredited organizations are regulated by several governmental agencies around the world in relation to quality and safety of cellular therapy products and reimbursement. When draft regulations or guidance documents are released, FACT committees review the information and submit comments as applicable to the scope of FACT accreditation. In the past decade, comments have been submitted to agencies in the United States, Australia, and Europe. The FACT Global Affairs Committee also supports cellular therapy leaders in developing countries to encourage use of FACT Standards.
So far this year, FACT has submitted comments on three topics to two agencies in the United States:
- Docket No. FDA-2017-D-6154 for “Evaluation of Devices Used with Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapies; Draft Guidance for Industry”; submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on February 9, 2018.
- Docket No. FDA-2017-D-6159 for “Expedited Programs for Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Serious Conditions; Draft Guidance for Industry”; submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on February 9, 2018.
- National Coverage Analysis for Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell Therapy for Cancers; submitted to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on June 15, 2018.
FACT also plans to review the recently published FDA draft guidance documents for gene therapies. These comments are due by October 10, 2018. If you have input you would like FACT to consider for inclusion, submit those to Kara Wacker at firstname.lastname@example.org by August 31, 2018.
Reporting of Adverse Events Related to Licensed Cellular Therapy Products
FACT Standards require reporting of adverse events related to cellular therapy product administration. FACT does not dictate the process or timing of such reporting, but requires that the reporting meets the requirements of applicable laws and regulations. We have fielded many questions via workshops, emails, and telephone calls regarding the reporting of adverse events related to commercial cellular therapy products (e.g., Kymriah, Yescarta).
Many stakeholders in the field are working on initiatives to make data reporting, including adverse event reporting, a more streamlined process. In the meantime, the FACT Immune Effector Cell Task Force recommends that programs define a reporting process and document it in a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The following are some tips for creating the process:
- Know, understand, and comply with the reporting requirements outlined in the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for the specific product(s) you administer. List these requirements in the SOP.
- For remaining gaps in the process, define your program’s reporting elements and frequency of reporting, including:
- The types of adverse events that your program will report immediately (e.g., all events, specific grades of cytokine release syndrome) and to what source (e.g., MedWatch, manufacturer).
- The types of adverse events that your program will collate for future reporting, the frequency of reporting such adverse events, and to whom the information will be reported.
- Maintain documentation of all adverse events and reporting records.
- Develop an audit plan and schedule for monitoring compliance with REMS requirements and the program-defined process.
- Regularly check in with your manufacturer contacts for any updates to their adverse event reporting requirements.
For additional information regarding adverse event reporting, visit the REMS websites of Kymriah and Yescarta, review FDA requirements for manufacturer reporting in 21 CFR 600.80 Postmarketing reporting of adverse experiences, and Standard B4.10 and its substandards in the FACT-JACIE HCT Standards and the FACT IEC Standards.
Requirements for Qualifying Third-Party Manufacturers of Cellular Therapy Products Regulated Under U.S. INDs or BLAs
In light of the recent licensing of immune effector cell (IEC) products in the United States, this is an opportune time to continue education regarding third-party manufacturers in general. The manufacturing process for many novel cellular therapy products, including research and licensed cellular therapy products, involves multiple entities: holders of Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for research or Biological License Applications (BLA) for licensure, collection facilities, and processing facilities. Clinical units may be involved with one or more of these facilities.
There are three main responsibilities when third-parties are involved in the manufacture of a research or licensed product: verify regulatory oversight, qualify the vendor or service provider, and define responsibilities.
Though many questions from organizations regarding these requirements are specific to IEC processes, the information below can also be used as guidelines for other types of cellular therapy products.
Verify Regulatory Oversight
- The participating manufacturer (e.g., collection or processing facility) is responsible for verifying that the contracting entity for whom it performs services possesses an approved IND or BLA.
- The Clinical Program is responsible for verifying the manufacturer responsible for the entire manufacturing process (e.g., a commercial manufacturer) possesses an approved IND or BLA.
Qualify the Third-Party Manufacturer
- The IND or BLA holder is responsible for verifying that any facility performing a step of manufacturing complies with GMP and GTP requirements as applicable (see 21 CFR 1271.150(c)(1)(iii)).
- If the IND or BLA is held internally by a FACT-accredited facility, then the facility must perform this qualification and provide documentation to FACT inspectors.
- If the IND or BLA is external, i.e., held by a third-party investigator or manufacturer, this qualification is outside the scope of FACT accreditation and the FACT-accredited facility is not required to provide documentation of this type of qualification to FACT inspectors.
The participating manufacturer must participate in site visits from the IND or BLA holder and provide the level of service required of that entity, including compliance with GMP and GTP requirements as applicable. FACT-accredited facilities that participate in manufacturing for external IND or BLA holders must provide FACT inspectors evidence of complying with these requirements as required by applicable laws and regulations.
- The Clinical Program must perform vendor qualification of the IND or BLA holder. It is the FDA that monitors regulatory compliance, and the Clinical Program only needs to perform vendor qualification. Programs must verify the IND or BLA holder meets its needs in regards to many areas of cellular therapy, including labeling processes (label content applied by whom and how), level of service (turnaround times, customer inquiries), and other metrics defined by the program. Documentation of this qualification must be provided to the FACT inspection team.
- It is acceptable to delegate this activity to the Processing Facility so long as there is robust communication between the program and facility, which should be obvious in documentation.
- The level of participation of the clinical service in manufacturing an immune effector cell product varies. Regardless of where the product is collected or manufactured, responsibilities must be clearly defined.
- If a Clinical Program is responsible for collecting cells or preparing the IEC product for administration, or if independently FACT-accredited cell collection and processing facilities contract with a manufacturer, FACT Standards for collection and processing apply to the steps performed.
- If products are received directly by the Clinical Program or intermediary facility (e.g., blood bank, pharmacy) from a third-party manufacturer, the following responsibilities must be defined at a minimum: chain of custody, product storage, verification of product identity, and management of adverse events. Additional responsibilities will be included in the new edition of FACT Standards to be published in March 2018.